Return to Answer

###Stop!

Please read this ↴ and understand that this is a non-issue:

Respect the community – your own, and others’

You cannot reasonably hope to create a site for:

"professionals and students of engineering [except for those in electrical, computer, aeronautics, <this>, <that>, and <the other>]."

It's a gerrymandered scope that is going to be completely unworkable.

Your focus is to design a scope suitable to a world-class "engineering site." Period. But that scope has to be coherent and whole to folks who may not be familiar with the Stack Exchange Network. Don't worry about other sites. You cannot start creating a bunch of asterisks^* and exceptions in your site design based on the existence of other sites. That will only create a really bad end-user experience to folks who suddenly find themselves being given the run-around.

Stop!

Please read this ↴ and understand that this is a non-issue:

Respect the community – your own, and others’

You cannot reasonably hope to create a site for:

"professionals and students of engineering [except for those in electrical, computer, aeronautics, <this>, <that>, and <the other>]."

It's a gerrymandered scope that is going to be completely unworkable.

Your focus is to design a scope suitable to a world-class "engineering site." Period. But that scope has to be coherent and whole to folks who may not be familiar with the Stack Exchange Network. Don't worry about other sites. You cannot start creating a bunch of asterisks^* and exceptions in your site design based on the existence of other sites. That will only create a really bad end-user experience to folks who suddenly find themselves being given the run-around.

###Stop!

Please read this ↴ and understand that this is a non-issue:

Respect the community – your own, and others’

You cannot create reasonably hope to create a site for:

"professionals and students of engineering [except for those in electrical, computer, aeronautics, <this>, <that>, and <the other>]."

It's a gerrymandered scope that is going to be completely unworkable.

Your focus is to design a scope suitable to a world-class "engineering site." Period. But that scope has to be coherent and whole to folks who may not be familiar with the Stack Exchange Network. Don't worry about other sites. You cannot start creating a bunch of asterisks^* and exceptions in your site design based on the existence of other sites. That will only create a really bad end-user experience to folks who suddenly find themselves being given the run-around.

###Stop!

Please read this ↴ and understand that this is a non-issue:

Respect the community – your own, and others’

You cannot reasonably hope to create a site for:

"professionals and students of engineering [except for those in electrical, computer, aeronautics, <this>, <that>, and <the other>]."

It's a gerrymandered scope that is going to be completely unworkable.

Your focus is to design a scope suitable to a world-class "engineering site." Period. But that scope has to be coherent and whole to folks who may not be familiar with the Stack Exchange Network. Don't worry about other sites. You cannot start creating a bunch of asterisks^* and exceptions in your site design based on the existence of other sites. That will only create a really bad end-user experience to folks who suddenly find themselves being given the run-around.

###Stop!

Please read this ↴ and understand this is a non-issue:

Respect the community – your own, and others’

You cannot create reasonably hope to create a site for:

"professionals and students of engineering [except for those in electrical, computer, aeronautics, <this>, <that>, and <the other>]."

It's a gerrymandered scope that is going to be completely unworkable.

Your focus is to design a scope suitable to a world-class "engineering site." Period. But that scope has to be coherent and whole to folks who may not be familiar with the Stack Exchange Network. Don't worry about other sites. You cannot start creating a bunch of asterisks^* and exceptions in your site design based on the existence of other sites. That will only create a really bad end-user experience to folks who suddenly find themselves being given the run-around.

###Stop!

Please read this ↴ and understand that this is a non-issue:

Respect the community – your own, and others’

You cannot create reasonably hope to create a site for:

"professionals and students of engineering [except for those in electrical, computer, aeronautics, <this>, <that>, and <the other>]."

It's a gerrymandered scope that is going to be completely unworkable.

Your focus is to design a scope suitable to a world-class "engineering site." Period. But that scope has to be coherent and whole to folks who may not be familiar with the Stack Exchange Network. Don't worry about other sites. You cannot start creating a bunch of asterisks^* and exceptions in your site design based on the existence of other sites. That will only create a really bad end-user experience to folks who suddenly find themselves being given the run-around.