I recently had this question closed with the motivation that it was too broad:
I disagree with the decision to close the question. I think someone with good understanding of the model quoted, could probably give a useful, succinct answer. I therefore think it would be better to leave this and similar questions open, until someone with the right experience might hopefully come up with a reply.
Asking how 6 parameters of beam characteristics can be interpreted intuitively, is not too broad.
(I have general opinions about Stack Exchange being too focused on formal aspects of the questions instead of trying to interpret the questions in the best possible way and try to supply good answers. But maybe that is for another question.)
I tried to discuss the question that was recently closed, but got no replies regarding why it was closed. I got some valuable comments that might gradually help building the knowledge necessary to reply to the question. (I have started simulating the parameters in question now. I have not come close to an answer yet, so far I can only say that reducing all parameters by a factor 1.e5 makes the beam "wobbly".)